ENA submission to Utilities Disputes Ltd about the proposed changes to the Energy Complaints Scheme arising from an independent review. The submission articulates concerns over UDL's perceived bias towards complainants, suggests improvements in governance transparency, and comments on several key recommendations such as natural justice principles and levy mechanisms.

ENA submission to the Commerce Commission about uncertainty mechanisms. The document discusses the need for adjustments to input methodologies, suggesting a three-step approach to reform: adjusting existing reopener structures, adding new uncertainty mechanisms, and modifying the IRIS if necessary.

ENA submission to the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority (EECA) about demand flexibility in the residential sector. The submission discusses the importance of incentivising and adopting demand flexibility products to manage network capacity constraints and mitigate electricity price rises, while highlighting the potential use of demand flexibility for emergency response.

ENA submission to the Electricity Authority about updating the regulatory settings for distribution networks to ensure efficient connection and utilisation of new technologies for a reliable and cost-effective electricity supply. The submission emphasises the importance of data exchange, flexibility services, and distributed energy resources in supporting New Zealand's transition to a low-carbon economy.

ENA submission to the Commerce Commission about the reconsideration of DPP3 default price quality path for Vector Lines Limited in response to Cyclone Gabrielle. ENA argues that combining interrelated catastrophic events under Input Methodology reopener provisions is consistent with the methodologies and supports consumer benefits by maintaining investment incentives and supporting efficient service delivery.

ENA submission to the Commerce Commission about the reconsideration of Vector’s health and safety DPP. ENA disagrees with the Commission's narrow interpretation of legislative changes and highlights the need for recognising the broader context of these changes in assessing their impact on electricity distribution businesses (EDBs).